Hey Enrique, Good work. We generally have an anti-recorder philosophy for Watir, and for any issues/user support you might want to resurrect WatirRecorder lists or set up a new one. I'm assuming you've talked to Scott about this as well? I don't know what the original license was. People will have questions about it, and I'd recommend you monitor this group and gently redirect to the group specific to the recorder.
There's more historical information in the group about why we choose not to support recorders, which I'd recommend taking a look at. Also you may want to blog a bit about your intentions and the inherent dangers in recorders. Without going into too much detail, most of which you'll find through a quick search, I'm more inclined to rename it and consider it a potential scraper, not recorder. hth, Charley Baker Lead Developer, Watir, http://watir.com On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 9:53 AM, watirboy <enrique.j.ma...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hey Guys, > > I dont know how else to tell people about this, and I hate promoting > it, but I have recently resurrected the WatirRecorder that Hanselman > did back in the day. It is updated to use more modern WATIR standards > and calls a config.xml file for template changes. > > http://code.google.com/p/watirrecordersharp/ > > I would love the community to play, test, break, and contribute if > possible. This is a first release, and I am planning on changing the > UI from utilizing SandBar and SandDock to WPF. > > Again, any help will be tremendous. It's a great tool and I would hate > to see it die... > > --watirboy > > -- > Before posting, please read http://watir.com/support. In short: search before > you ask, be nice. > > watir-general@googlegroups.com > http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general > watir-general+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > -- Before posting, please read http://watir.com/support. In short: search before you ask, be nice. watir-general@googlegroups.com http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general watir-general+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
