"The dogfood step makes sense - if the wave documentation can't be maintained in a wave, what's the point!"
Surely the point is for wiab to reach a point where it can be used for the documentation? If, however, we wait for that before any docs, we might never get to that stage to start with! On 11 December 2010 18:31, Guylhem Aznar <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello > > On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 13:19, Hugh Dougherty <[email protected]>wrote: > >> I'm an editor with some technical skill. I'll help wherever needed. Just >> let >> me know what I need to do. > > > I will also be happy to help with the documentation. > > IMHO, the project is still evolving as some others said in the thread. > There's still the risk of a tutorial bringing new users who try/see that it > doesn't work as well as it should/loudly complain before giving up. > Documentation will be good when users can actually do something useful in a > reliable way. > > The dogfood step makes sense - if the wave documentation can't be maintained > in a wave, what's the point! > > Guylhem >
