Hi to all, just joined the list :)

I'll help with the documentation to begin an implementation from scratch,
maybe not as main writer but I'll help to review everything and provide all
my experience...

Probably as I have already port wave platform to other language,
(c#.net), this might help, and also I'll adapt some pieces of wave-vs code
to be open source and share with the project...



regards
jesus salas





On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Nathanael Abbotts
<[email protected]>wrote:

> As the project plans to move to a new home at Apache, I feel quite strongly
> that it would be a very good idea to draft up some whitepapers (or similar)
> clarifying some things that there appears to be quite a bit of confusion
> about.
> Good code requires good planning and good documentation, and so far, I
> haven't seen much planning or documentation regarding a couple of very
> important things:
>
>   - Operational Transformation
>      - OT is one of the fundamental backends of the Wave Protocol, but the
>      OT whitepaper is extremely lacking. For example, I got more
> information on
>      the subject from a blog
> post<
> http://www.codecommit.com/blog/java/understanding-and-applying-operational-transformation
> >than
> from the whitepaper.
>      - Detail is needed on the following:
>         - The algorithms used by the project currently.
>         - What still needs to be implemented.
>      - Client implementation
>      - More detail is needed on exactly what a client that wants to make
>      use of the client-server protocol should do, e.g.
>         - Encryption/Signing
>         - Message protocols
>      - Federation Protocol
>      - Again, not just a 'how it works', but 'how you should do it if
>      implementing a server in a different language'
>
> I hope to see some of these appearing soon, and would be more than happy to
> write them myself, if someone would kindly inform me on them.
> --
> Nathanael Abbotts
>
> Email: [email protected]
> Wave: [email protected]
> Twitter: @natabbotts (http://twitter.com/natabbotts)
>

Reply via email to