On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Michael MacFadden
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Yes, I agree eventually we will put this into the package.html.  Hopefully as 
> we get the maven build working we will be building the javadocs as well.

I will try to read the wave-dev list more accurate now. I have made
some huge maven stuff recently and the pain I felt might be of help to
wave. Probably I can contribute a patch or two, if I read of problems
on the ml.

> In terms of logging, this struck me as add also.  On thing to remember 
> though, is that a lot of the code is compiled by GWT into javascript code.  
> So code that is common between the server and the client, can only make use 
> of libraries that are available on the client side.  Log4J is not available 
> in the browser.  So it looks like a simplified logging mechanism was added 
> that would work in both cases.


Oh, i see. One more question: it seems to me that GWT is heavily tied
to the Server code. Is it such a good idea, or would it be better to
care of the server as more or less independent project? If things are
mixed too much, it may do some trouble. I have not looked at the
logging code, but because of my work at Apache Logging i have learned
that logging is not a trivial task. It makes me a bit anxious when I
read that this code can be used on client and server side. But again,
I did not look at the code in detail.

Cheers
Christian

>
> ~Michael
>
> On Jun 26, 2012, at 7:43 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>
>> Interesting insight.
>>
>> I think this information should also go into package.html.
>>
>> Besides, I have two questions:
>>
>> - why isn't the apache namespace aka org.apache.wave.* used?
>> - i see much packages containing logging stuff. Why is it there? Are
>> there any special needs which requires implementing custom stuff
>> instead of using tools like log4j 2 or slf4j?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Christian
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 12:28 AM, Michael MacFadden
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> All,
>>>
>>> In an attempt to build a sensible maven structure and to start to document 
>>> our code base, I have started working up the following table:
>>>
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WAVE/Source+Code+Organization
>>>
>>> If people can review and comment that would be great.
>>>
>>> ~Michael
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> http://www.grobmeier.de
>> https://www.timeandbill.de
>



-- 
http://www.grobmeier.de
https://www.timeandbill.de

Reply via email to