On 26/06/12 15:57, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Michael MacFadden
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Yes, I agree eventually we will put this into the package.html.  Hopefully 
>> as we get the maven build working we will be building the javadocs as well.
> I will try to read the wave-dev list more accurate now. I have made
> some huge maven stuff recently and the pain I felt might be of help to
> wave. Probably I can contribute a patch or two, if I read of problems
> on the ml.

We're working on the Maven port at http://github.com/pires/wave. Feel
free to open new issues, comment on new ones and/or provide pull-requests.

>
>> In terms of logging, this struck me as add also.  On thing to remember 
>> though, is that a lot of the code is compiled by GWT into javascript code.  
>> So code that is common between the server and the client, can only make use 
>> of libraries that are available on the client side.  Log4J is not available 
>> in the browser.  So it looks like a simplified logging mechanism was added 
>> that would work in both cases.
>
> Oh, i see. One more question: it seems to me that GWT is heavily tied
> to the Server code. Is it such a good idea, or would it be better to
> care of the server as more or less independent project? If things are
> mixed too much, it may do some trouble. I have not looked at the
> logging code, but because of my work at Apache Logging i have learned
> that logging is not a trivial task. It makes me a bit anxious when I
> read that this code can be used on client and server side. But again,
> I did not look at the code in detail.
>
> Cheers
> Christian
>
>> ~Michael
>>
>> On Jun 26, 2012, at 7:43 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>>
>>> Interesting insight.
>>>
>>> I think this information should also go into package.html.
>>>
>>> Besides, I have two questions:
>>>
>>> - why isn't the apache namespace aka org.apache.wave.* used?
>>> - i see much packages containing logging stuff. Why is it there? Are
>>> there any special needs which requires implementing custom stuff
>>> instead of using tools like log4j 2 or slf4j?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Christian
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 12:28 AM, Michael MacFadden
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> All,
>>>>
>>>> In an attempt to build a sensible maven structure and to start to document 
>>>> our code base, I have started working up the following table:
>>>>
>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WAVE/Source+Code+Organization
>>>>
>>>> If people can review and comment that would be great.
>>>>
>>>> ~Michael
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> http://www.grobmeier.de
>>> https://www.timeandbill.de
>
>

-- 
Paulo Pires



Reply via email to