> Ali, I am noting that the logo attribution calls for citing a Google > copyright. Is that still valid?
This is something I am unsure of. It was last asked in the list back in August 2011, for which the response from Google was (to the more general question of "I mean that Google cleared it out that it donates the WIAB code along with the Wiki and logo to Apache?"): "Yes, this is covered. On 22 December 2010 I ([email protected]) submitted the appropriate materials for the grant from Google to Apache ([email protected]). Less than 2 hours later, Craig L Russel ([email protected]) acknowledged receipt." > How does Apache then relate to intellectual > property ownership for Wave assets at this time? I understand the structure > generally, but especially as assets are still being moved from Google > servers to Apache servers, I am not sure exactly where this all stands. Who > might be the best person to engage on these sorts of questions? So, my understanding is that all assets have been moved to Apache control. Though I do not have access to the documents detailing explicitly which this really means. @Michael: Perhaps you can provide a better answer here on attribution for the Open Wave logo? [On a related note: Is the name "Apache Wave" trademarked? It is not in the Apache listing, but that is noted to only be a partial listing] Ali
