One of my extensions set an arbitrary annotation, not defined by the conversation model, to "mark" a text within a blip. I am pretty certain that is a legitimate use of the API. I think the annotations defined by the draft are the ones that should be recognized by the wave server.
Eyal. On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 11:07 PM, Kusako <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi- > > reading through the conversation spec I came across this "The > following are the allowed annotations allowed in blip documents. " > Does this mean you ae not allowed to add arbitrary annotations to a > blip (to be displayed by a special purpose client rather for > example)? > > Still new to wave, so sorry if this is a stupid question... > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Wave Protocol" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<wave-protocol%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
