Ok thanks, good to know that it actualy works. Did some more reading and the docs on the robot API explicitly mention custom annotations: http://code.google.com/apis/wave/extensions/robots/#CustomAnnotations . So I probably just misinterpreted the conversation spec.
-markus On 28 Feb., 08:04, eyalzh <[email protected]> wrote: > One of my extensions set an arbitrary annotation, not defined by the > conversation model, to "mark" a text within a blip. I am pretty certain that > is a legitimate use of the API. I think the annotations defined by the draft > are the ones that should be recognized by the wave server. > > Eyal. > > On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 11:07 PM, Kusako > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > Hi- > > > reading through the conversation spec I came across this "The > > following are the allowed annotations allowed in blip documents. " > > Does this mean you ae not allowed to add arbitrary annotations to a > > blip (to be displayed by a special purpose client rather for > > example)? > > > Still new to wave, so sorry if this is a stupid question... > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Wave Protocol" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]<wave-protocol%[email protected]> > > . > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
