Disreguard this please. blog post answers these :-) On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Matt Richards <[email protected]> wrote:
> From what the blog says, it will not be the same as the current Google Wave > Service.. > I'd gather it'll lack the robot APIs, and potentally the embedding APIs but > what else? > > What about the data that is in Google's Wave Server now, will there be > tools to export it and import it into Wave in a Box? > > On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 8:45 AM, Alex North <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 3 September 2010 21:11, ThomasWrobel <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Wave In a Box looks fantastic and should make it easier to "get into >>> wave". >>> I really appreciate the work done by the team, and this should really >>> help the community take over from the excellent work Google has done >>> so far. >>> >>> Just one question; What exactly will be the distribution of >>> WiaB....some sort of pre-setup Linux bundle of software? (ie, an XMPP >>> server+WFP extension+mongo etc) >>> Getting all the configuration right for FedOne got quite confusing, >>> especially for federation, so I'm hoping this will be a little >>> easier :) >>> >> >> Great question. We definitely hope to produce something like you describe >> (maybe you can help?) but we haven't nailed it down yet. The federation >> setup is complex, though some of that seems unavoidable. Note that WIAB will >> be useful for small organisations even without federation, and indeed >> already you can run FedOne without configuring that. >> >> Alex >> >> >>> Either way, I'm liking the description. >>> >>> Wave On! >>> >>> -Thomas >>> >>> On Sep 3, 5:48 am, Lennard de Rijk <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > Hi Joel and Charles, >>> > >>> > On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Joel Dietz <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > > Thanks so much to the Wave development team for your work to date and >>> this >>> > > announcement, which as far as I am concerned ties up all of the loose >>> ends. >>> > > I look forward to contributing to the Wave protocol and associated >>> code as I >>> > > am able. >>> > >>> > You are welcome, looking forward to your and for that matter any other >>> > people contributing to this project. >>> > >>> > > Wave on! (I think I need that on a t-shirt) >>> > >>> > As a software engineer I'm all about t-shirts, feel free to sent them >>> along >>> > :). >>> > >>> > @Charles >>> > >>> > On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 12:43 PM, cearl <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > > I wonder if there is any anticipated point for support of the robot >>> or >>> > > data api? I haven't looked very much into the internals of either >>> > > enough to estimate the effort that would be involved to roll this >>> out, >>> > > but it my experience has been that it's not too difficult to >>> integrate >>> > > gadget-like things into the simple UI as is. >>> > >>> > At the moment I'm unable to answer these questions, I'll however make >>> sure >>> > that someone else takes a look at them >>> > >>> > > Also, is there any plan for fixing the various browser compatibility >>> > > (mostly Safari) issues around WebSockets? >>> > > Sorry for the divergent threads here. >>> > >>> > Would you mind filing an issue report for that on [0]? This would make >>> it >>> > easier for us to track what is going on. I'm guessing you are talking >>> about >>> > the errors occurring because of breaking changes in the websocket >>> protocol >>> > between different draft versions. >>> > >>> > Greetings, >>> > Lennard >>> > >>> > [0]http://code.google.com/p/wave-protocol/issues/entry >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "Wave Protocol" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> [email protected]<wave-protocol%[email protected]> >>> . >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en. >>> >>> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Wave Protocol" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]<wave-protocol%[email protected]> >> . >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en. >> > > > > -- > --Matt > -- --Matt -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
