>-----Original Message----- >From: Chris Morgan [mailto:chmor...@gmail.com] >Sent: Friday, March 02, 2012 7:50 AM >To: Kristian Høgsberg >Cc: Michael Hasselmann; wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; Eoff, Ullysses >A >Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Resubmit - Unit test framework for Wayland > >2012/3/2 Kristian Høgsberg <k...@bitplanet.net>: >> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Chris Morgan <chmor...@gmail.com> >wrote: >>>> I found that a good testing framework can lower the barrier of writing >>>> useful tests. Nice logging and status reports are important I feel. And >>>> if for example you can easily write data driven tests, then testing all >>>> possible code paths in a critical area becomes straight-forward and the >>>> tests will remain readable (and with that, maintainable; people tend >>>> forget that every test also adds to the overall maintenance costs which >>>> can often enough outweight the benefits of the test). It's actually the >>>> one thing I really like about Qt's testlib. >>>> >>> >>> +1 for leveraging a framework instead of writing another one :-) >> >> Sorry, this is not helpful. If you have a point to make that's not >> already covered in the thread, please do. But if you want to +1 >> something, go use Google+, they're big on that. >> >> Kristian > > >Just saying that I've written a ton of nunit unit tests for projects >and I've found that particular framework to be very useful in >separating out the tests, reporting results etc. I've gone the write >my own way before and it wasn't as productive. > >Chris
I totally agree, Chris. Writing our own framework has a huge cost to productivity. Artie _______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel