Hi,
On 2 March 2012 21:53, Andreas Ericsson <a...@op5.se> wrote:
> I've written a few in my days. Normally, I keep them ridiculously
> simple, so the testing code looks something like this (sorry for the
> sucky indentation; coding in a mua is always crap):
>
> some_test_func(args)
> {
> test_suite t;
> int x, y;
>
> x = 5;
> y = x;
> test(&t, x == y, "x(%d) and y(%d) should be equal", x, y);
> stest(&t, x == y); /* would print "fail: x == y evaluated as FALSE" */
> end_tests(&t); /* would print "OK: %d/%d tests passed */
> }
Maybe it's just a poor example, but something like this:
some_test_func(args)
{
int x = 5;
int y = 5;
printf("checking if C compiler isn't thoroughly broken ... ");
assert(x == y);
printf("success\n");
}
would seem to work just as well.
I can almost see the argument for something slightly more
comprehensive though, since rendercheck-style results of being able to
compare various runs in their entirety rather than bailing out on the
first failure, are more useful. But still ...
Cheers,
Daniel
_______________________________________________
wayland-devel mailing list
wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
