On segunda-feira, 18 de novembro de 2013 10:35:58, Bill Spitzak wrote: > I also want to put in a very strong vote against any kind of idea that a > client can "prefer SSD", as is being continuously suggested here with > comments like this: > > Thiago Macieira wrote: > > A client MAY ask the compositor to draw decorations. > > This is going to be used as an excuse by clients to *require* SSD.
A client may ask, but the server may not support the extension. If it doesn't, then it won't reply and then the client will have to draw its decoration. But your other suggestion that the compositor tells clients not to draw is even better. The only detail is that this extension doesn't exist yet, so the compositor needs to check whether the client acknowledged the message. If it didn't, then the compositor must assume the client is decorating itself. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
