Please always use reply-to-all, you have dropped a lot people from CC. On Wed, 07 May 2014 11:02:56 -0700 Bill Spitzak <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 05/07/2014 01:47 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > > > It is for normal windows like registered with xdg_shell where > > sub-surfaces are not suitable for tooltips. A sub-surface is a part of > > the window, not another window. A tooltip is not expected to change the > > window geometry, but a sub-surface does count into the window geometry. > > Extruding sub-surfaces therefore affect the (parent) window geometry. It > > is in the protocol spec. > > Are you saying that a sub-surface that extends outside the area of the > parent surface should cause mouse/touch events in this extended area to > be delivered to the parent? No. If a sub-surface can receive input events, the input events will refer the sub-surface's wl_surface. However, the window geometry for window management purposes is a very different thing. > My personal feeling is that the intuitive approach that events are > delivered "normally" to subsurfaces is the correct one. Especially if > subsurfaces are going to be the method of embedding one client inside > another. I think it is ok to say that subsurfaces with non-empty input > areas are broken in toytoolkit. Sub-surfaces cannot be used to embed another client. - pq _______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
