On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 11:47:08AM +0300, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > On Tue, 6 May 2014 14:40:53 -0700 > Kristian Høgsberg <hoegsb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 05:02:15PM +0300, Ander Conselvan de Oliveira > > wrote: > > > From: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira > > > <ander.conselvan.de.olive...@intel.com> > > > > > > Otherwise it might receive touch events. > > > > I think a better approach is to just hide the tooltip if it (or the > > panel) gets touch events. I don't think I agree with Pekka that we > > can't use subsurfaces for this, but I guess I'm not sure what the > > problem he sees there is. > > The panel is not a window, so sub-surfaces can be made to work there > well enough. > > It is for normal windows like registered with xdg_shell where > sub-surfaces are not suitable for tooltips. A sub-surface is a part of > the window, not another window. A tooltip is not expected to change the > window geometry, but a sub-surface does count into the window geometry. > Extruding sub-surfaces therefore affect the (parent) window geometry. It > is in the protocol spec.
No, sure if no other geometry information is available. For xdg-shell windows, the window geometry overrides that though. And I don't think there's a clear distinction between being part of the window or being a separate window here, and I don't see why it would useful... Kristian > > > Thanks, > pq _______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel