On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 09:06:13 -0700 Bill Spitzak <spit...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 04/29/2015 12:21 AM, Giulio Camuffo wrote: > > Just to be clear, are you suggesting the scanner should generate two > > headers for an xml, one including the old headers and one including > > the core ones? I'm not sure i see the advantage of this compared to > > the option... > > The back-compatibility one would be hand-written, not generated. It is > only needed for existing protocols. However I don't feel this is necessary. > > Just to be clear, my proposal is: > > wayland-client.h : hand-written, includes: > wayland-client-core.h > wayland-client-protocol.h > deprecated api > > wayland-client-core.h : hand-written, includes > wl_event_queue, wl_proxy, etc > > *-protocol.h : generated, includes > inline wrappers for messages and events > wayland-client-core.h Once again, after discussion, you ended up proposing exactly what the original poster's original patches did. Thanks, pq _______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
