On Mon, 18 May 2015 19:23:20 -0700 Bryce Harrington <br...@osg.samsung.com> wrote:
> On Sat, May 02, 2015 at 11:52:22PM +0200, Auke Booij wrote: > > On 19 April 2015 at 14:51, Jeroen Bollen <jbin...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > It seems like this discussion died off. Currently there is no way to tell, > > > from the Wayland XML specification whether an argument is a bitfield, or > > > whether the argument takes an enum and what enum this is. > Since we're only a couple weeks out from a release, and since this > obviously is a non-trivial change to the API, I'd be most comfortable if > we held this until 1.9 opens, and land it then; that would give us > maximum time to test this. Hi, yeah, this is definitely not post-alpha material, because it is changing the Wayland protocol XML language, which is even more fundamental than the wayland.xml itself. Also, with wayland.xml we know what things change ABI, but changing the XML language is much harder to reason about, as the discussion shows. Sorry, but I do not have time to look into this soon. Thanks, pq _______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
