On Tue, 07 Feb 2006 11:12:04 -0600, "Ian Bicking" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Maybe the reason those voices are missing -- I now realize -- is that > there aren't many "active page" frameworks left. Spyce was, but since > then I believe a more traditional controller-driven API has been added
Yes, but you can still write plain active-page stuff if you wanted to. > -- I don't know if the "active" part has been extracted from Spyce or > not, but at least that portion is optional (and if you are embedding > Spyce into another framework it is likely you won't want that part). I'm not exactly sure what you have in mind here, but the active-page- ness of Spyce isn't really optional the way I think of it. Views still correspond one-to-one with .spy active pages. The new part is it's easy to put the controller in a separate .py file. (Spyce has always been able to import vanilly .py code, so separating out the model isn't new.) -Jonathan -- C++ is history repeated as tragedy. Java is history repeated as farce. --Scott McKay _______________________________________________ Web-SIG mailing list Web-SIG@python.org Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/archive%40mail-archive.com
