At first I was going to respond "+1". But the fact that a couple of years haven't led to much suggests that it's unlikely to be fruitful; there just are too many diverging ideas on what is right. (Which makes sense since it's a huge and fast developing field.)
So unless someone (Alan Kennedy?) actually puts forward a PEP and gets it through a review of the major players on web-sig, I'm skeptical. I certainly don't want this potential effort to keep us from adding the low-hanging fruit (wsgiref, with perhaps some tweaks as PJE can manage based on recent feedback here) to the 2.5 stdlib. --Guido On 2/16/06, Bill Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thinking about this some more, it's beginning to sound to me like the > > server-side web support in the standard library needs a proper review > > and possible rework: it's slowly decohering/kipplizing. > > > > Maybe we need a PEP, so that we can all discuss the subject > > (rationally ;-) and sort out all of the issues before we go ahead and > > commit anything? > > Great idea! That's exactly what I thought when I organized this SIG a > couple of years ago. -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) _______________________________________________ Web-SIG mailing list Web-SIG@python.org Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/archive%40mail-archive.com