On 26/12/2007, Phillip J. Eby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 12:28 PM 12/24/2007 +0100, Manlio Perillo wrote: > >By the way: isn't it better to first release a WSGI 1.1 before > >jumping to a (incompatible) WSGI 2.0? > > Better for whom, and for what purpose?
As has been pointed out before, the main discrepancy known of is the definition of readline() on wsgi.input. Don't know of anything that implements it per the specification because if it was written per the specification then cgi.FieldStorage wouldn't work. The other more recent issue is how to interpret the WSGI specification for Python 3. Personally I don't think it is sufficient that the only mention of these issues is in the archives of the mailing list. Even if you personally don't want a version 1.1 specification, would you consider an official addendum to the 1.0 specification with it being at least posted on www.wsgi.org if the PEP itself can't be amended. Graham _______________________________________________ Web-SIG mailing list Web-SIG@python.org Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/archive%40mail-archive.com
