Phillip J. Eby ha scritto: > At 04:15 PM 12/26/2007 +1100, Graham Dumpleton wrote: >> On 26/12/2007, Phillip J. Eby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > At 12:28 PM 12/24/2007 +0100, Manlio Perillo wrote: >> > >By the way: isn't it better to first release a WSGI 1.1 before >> > >jumping to a (incompatible) WSGI 2.0? >> > >> > Better for whom, and for what purpose? >> > >[...] > > These are good things to have, sure. But this doesn't answer the > question of why doing that first would be *better* than doing 2.0 first, > assuming that there is any reason why they can't or shouldn't be worked > on concurrently. >
The problem is that WSGI 2.0 does not yet exists; instead WSGI 1.0 has already been implemented in several different environments so it seems better to first "complete" WSGI 1.0 (errata, addendum, or 1.1). Manlio Perillo _______________________________________________ Web-SIG mailing list Web-SIG@python.org Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/archive%40mail-archive.com
