On Monday 04 February 2008, Jim Fulton wrote: > Breeds are constantly evolving. I don't think it's realistic for the > standard library to try to keep up. I also don't think it's a very > good idea for language maintainers to make judgements about what's > best in various application areas. > > I have the impression that there's this fairly large effort for people > to redo lots of the standard library for Python 3, without necessarily > knowing a lot about the libraries' histories, and motivation. I;m > skeptical that this is going to lead to a high-quality product. > > I'd much rather see language developers put some focus on making a low- > level feature like a packaging system work as well as possible.
Amen to that. :-) Regards, Stephan -- Stephan Richter Web Software Design, Development and Training Google me. "Zope Stephan Richter" _______________________________________________ Web-SIG mailing list Web-SIG@python.org Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/archive%40mail-archive.com
