On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 01:03, Chris McDonough <chr...@plope.com> wrote: > A PEP was submitted and accepted today for a WSGI successor protocol > named Web3: > > http://python.org/dev/peps/pep-0444/ > > I'd encourage other folks to suggest improvements to that spec or to > submit a competing spec, so we can get WSGI-on-Python3 settled soon.
I find the order of the application return arguments really annoying, could it just be status, headers, body? Mirrors the actual structure of the request, which is easier to remember IMO. Also, I would really like it if the header value returned by applications must be checked for an .items() method so we can return (o)dicts in addition to tuples. I also keep thinking that some things (for example status) should just be allowed to be text, but restricted to ascii. Cheers, Dirkjan _______________________________________________ Web-SIG mailing list Web-SIG@python.org Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/archive%40mail-archive.com
