P.J. Eby <p...@...> writes: > > At 12:43 PM 1/4/2011 +0000, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > >Alice BevanMcGregor <al...@...> writes: > > [1] > >http:://bit.ly/e7rtI6 So, while we are at it, could we get rid of > >the "CGI server example" in this new SWGI spec? This is 2011, and we > >should promote modern idioms, not encourage people to do 1995 Web > >programming. 10 years ago, CGI was already frown upon. (and even the > >idea that WSGI should provide some kind of CGI compatibility sounds > >a bit ridiculous to me) Regards Antoine. > > I still use CGI for the odd one-off, testing, prototyping, etc., and > it's by far the easiest thing to deploy on a lot of web hosts.
Really? Isn't that the kind of thing for which wsgiref should be the preferred choice? As for deployment, why would anyone recommend using CGI in production? Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Web-SIG mailing list Web-SIG@python.org Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/archive%40mail-archive.com
