No 3. The Larch ? Not an animal, but I hope at least a couple of readers understand the reference :)
On Dec 17, 9:37 pm, vihang <vihan...@gmail.com> wrote: > interesting... whats a python-friendly animal? > > On Dec 18, 12:34 am, pedro <pedro...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Persoanlly I don't think I'll use T2. > > If T2 comes with T3 which it necessarily has to, what's the problem of > > whomever wants to use T2 getting it by downloading T3? My guess is > > that you'll end up using T3 anyway and eventually going a bit to a > > lower level here and there to achieve a bit more customization of your > > application. I don't know. Just my way of looking at the whole thing. > > > As for the name... massimo, I believe you're Italian right? Open > > source projects often come with funny/cute names of fruits, animals, > > dishes, etc. often in other languages. Since italian is a language > > with many open vowels and with may words that are quite easy to > > pronounce I would suggest some italian word. I don't know... like... > > which animal would web2py if it would be an animal? > > Then T3 could be called something after web2py... I don't something > > like > > web2py => cat > > T3 => tiger > > somthing like that... don't know. > > > On 17 Dec, 20:38, "Paul D. Eden" <benchl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > +1 for adding a plugin system to web2py and making T2 a plugin. > > > > A standardised and documented plugin system will, in an of itself, be > > > a great boon to web2py. > > > - Plugins (modules) are the reason that drupal became as big as it > > > did. > > > > Now with that said, web2py already has applications. > > > > What exactly is the difference between plugins and applications? > > > - In my mind, applications are sets of files can run alone (and be > > > distributed via tar files (a great system is already in place for > > > doing this)) > > > and plugins would be meant as building blocks in applications or a > > > means of overriding and changing the default behaviour of web2py or an > > > application. > > > > On Dec 15, 12:48 pm, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> wrote: > > > > > So far nothing changed yet. > > > > > So far I did exactly what you said and I just reposted plugin_t2 > > > > making sure the t2.py is the same as the t3 one. > > > > > I just do not want to maintain two apps that share mostly the same > > > > files. > > > > > Let's keep this discussion going. I am not sure myself what the best > > > > way is. > > > > > Massimo > > > > > On Dec 15, 1:33 pm, Kacper Krupa <pageno...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > I agree with ceej, he's right. > > > > > > On 15 Gru, 20:27, ceej <cjlaz...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > I understand what you are saying Massimo and Vince, but what I mean > > > > > > is > > > > > > I just think t2 should be kept separate and maintained as a sort of > > > > > >pluginand I think vince you proved my point by saying "web2py, T2 and > > > > > > T3 are quite confusing, i guess we may need a plugins system for > > > > > > web2py. " I don't think merging t2 with t3 and then adding t3 > > > > > > specific > > > > > > things into t2 was a good idea I think you should have extended t2 > > > > > > in > > > > > > a separate module for t3 specific things, because one I think it > > > > > > confuses things like Vince points out and two could cause a lot of > > > > > > trouble down the line when people just want toplugint2. > > > > > > > On Dec 15, 12:36 am, vince <lapcc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > i've been playing with T3, T3 actually is a sample wiki build on > > > > > > > top > > > > > > > of T2 plus some extra features too. > > > > > > > > i think what Massimo mean is he will no longer distribute T2 > > > > > > > itself as > > > > > > > you can find it on T3. right? > > > > > > > > web2py, T2 and T3 are quite confusing, i guess we may need a > > > > > > > plugins > > > > > > > system for web2py. > > > > > > > > vince > > > > > > > > On Dec 15, 2:01 pm, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> wrote: > > > > > > > > > This is what I meant. t2 is contained and will be contained in > > > > > > > > t3. > > > > > > > > > On Dec 14, 4:11 pm, ceej <cjlaz...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I like the idea of t3 but I also really like the idea of t2, > > > > > > > > > I feel t2 > > > > > > > > > should be separate from t3 and the extra features in t2 that > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > specifically for t3 should be in a separate module extending > > > > > > > > > t2. > > > > > > > > > Because t2 is a great module to plug into any application and > > > > > > > > > helps > > > > > > > > > speed up the development process. Which I think a lot of > > > > > > > > > developers > > > > > > > > > like the idea of. T3 is more of an application already for > > > > > > > > > someone to > > > > > > > > > build on top of and is ok for certain types of projects. So I > > > > > > > > > really > > > > > > > > > think we should consider "merging" t2 into t3. > > > > > > > > > > What are other peoples thoughts? > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 14, 9:51 am, Joe Barnhart <joe.barnh...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > In keeping with the web2py theme, a couple which come to > > > > > > > > > > mind are: > > > > > > > > > > > app2py > > > > > > > > > > > webapp2py > > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 10, 4:13 pm, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > This is not the final word. I think we need a better > > > > > > > > > > > name. T3 is not > > > > > > > > > > > easily identifiable. > > > > > > > > > > > > Suggestions? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py Web Framework" group. To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
