> As mentioned before I am aware that I can set message strings if I don't like them. However, from my POV, email verification is *broken* out of the box. Sure, a mail gets sent, but the link in that mail doesn't work. Do we want to make it easy to use this stuff, or what? If this was discussed before, my apologies.
Now we can do two things. 1. Document this peculiar web2py behavior, ie, big letters in the Auth docstring, "don't forget to set message.verify_email, and you may need a fullurl function to go with it, which we won't provide for security reasons, nah nah nah nah nah" or 2. Fix it, since it is trivial enough. ;-) Maybe this is my chance to contribute: please put my suggestion to Chris in the "official web2py documentation", by way of implementing option 1. ;-)) Cheers, -Peter On Feb 9, 5:07 pm, Wes James <compte...@gmail.com> wrote: > As mentioned before it is so the developer can put in their own messge. > > -wj > > On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 9:04 AM, Peter <peter.kleyn...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Massimo, > > > You are understandably cautious about using absolute urls, but sending > > verification mails is one place where we really need them. > > > Currently, in tools.py line 646 you insert only the key into the > > verification message; how about inserting the validation_url as well? > > > Line 360 could then be something like > > auth.messages.verify_email = \ > > 'Click on the link: %(validate_url)s/%(key)s to verify your > > email' > > <snip> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py Web Framework" group. To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
