Thanks for that. Was looking to see how tender the adapter was and how far it could be pushed, and that may have answered it.
On Tuesday, November 20, 2012 2:50:20 AM UTC+11, Adi wrote: > > Hi Simon, i didn't go too far with DAL and mongo. Managed to get the grid, > but as mentioned before had a problem retrieving individual record > (document) for view and update. Then I included pymongo, and got needed > functionality outside of grid, but didn't have time then to continue > working on it. > > Agreed with Vasile that it should be design properly, and then implemented > as a nosql version of DAL. Not sure how I could help, if not with coding, > then with testing at least? > > > On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 5:02 PM, Simon Ashley <greg...@gmail.com<javascript:> > > wrote: > >> What issues are you coming up against with Mongo/ nosql ports and DAL >> operations? >> Interested because we need to start investigating this. >> >> >> On Sunday, November 18, 2012 12:02:12 PM UTC+10, Adi wrote: >>> >>> Definitely would be nice to support NoSQL. >>> >>> I tried the existing DAL with MongoDB and grid worked fine to the point >>> of view/edit record. Due to different concepts (sql/nosql) if it's hard to >>> keep them in a same DAL, maybe there could be a separate layer for NoSQL. >>> >>> I would be glad to test lots in this area, since I'm trying to port 4-5M >>> records into MongoDB, and currently I use web2py with pymongo for that. >>> >>> >>> On Saturday, November 17, 2012 7:19:15 AM UTC-5, Massimo Di Pierro wrote: >>>> >>>> http://labs.codernity.com/**codernitydb/index.html<http://labs.codernity.com/codernitydb/index.html> >>>> >>> -- >> >> >> >> > > > > --
