mee too, didn't notice in the cut-paste madness.

On Wednesday, December 12, 2012 9:57:06 AM UTC+1, Paolo wrote:
>
> Hi and great job!
>
> One thing that I don't like is at line 10
> apt-get -y dist-upgrade
>
> this was also in the previous version, actually I see this too 
> restrictive, for example I have ubuntu 12.04 and don't want to move to 12.10
>
> Paolo
>
>
> On Wednesday, December 12, 2012 12:06:16 AM UTC+1, Niphlod wrote:
>>
>> I run uwsgi using the emperor mode for some time now.... based on my 
>> config I tried to upgrade the existing one. Result is available at 
>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/n7chteos9sh6p2h/setup-web2py-nginx-uwsgi-ubuntu.sh
>>
>> I'm looking forward to improve things both on uwsgi niceties and general 
>> bash customization (the moment I saw fabric <http://fabfile.org> I 
>> almost stopped writing bash :-P)
>>
>> Improvements:
>> - no uwsgi from debian packages (overcomplicated configurations). uwsgi 
>> is installed from pip (so you can upgrade with a simple pip install 
>> --upgrade uwsgi)
>> - optional response.static_version friendly static directories 
>> configuration (added also cache headers as an option)
>> - improved syntax for web2py.xml (no app, no plugin)
>> - example of uwsgi cron facility (clean sessions script included)
>> - uwsgi emperor mode, managed with Upstart
>> - optional upstart pre-script command to fix permissions and compress 
>> static files
>>
>> If interested, I can make a fabfile for that.
>>
>> <offtopic on> I use Redis as cache but for the "I love embedded" guys 
>> uwsgi has a cache framework. I'm accepting votes to make a uwsgi's cache 
>> compatible module for web2py, but you will have to test it (no time for 
>> that, sorry)
>> <offtopic off>
>>
>

-- 



Reply via email to