I think you're right. In addition, the *quality *attribute is not such an easy-peasy as I thought.
Some clarification from Stack Overflow: LINK<http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4354543/determining-jpg-quality-in-python-pil> Need to dig deeper. Thanks, anyway. On Thursday, June 20, 2013 11:24:55 PM UTC+2, Paolo valleri wrote: > > I am not sure but the quality option could be for jpeg only. > Paolo > On Thursday, June 20, 2013 5:06:06 PM UTC+2, lesssugar wrote: >> >> A bit of offtopic but maybe someone knows what's going on. I'm using this >> thumbnail generating slice I found: >> >> LINK<http://www.web2pyslices.com/slice/show/1522/generate-a-thumbnail-that-fits-in-a-box> >> >> All works fine but the problem I face is the thumbnails quality. I upload >> really high-quality images and the generated thumbs are definitely not HQ. >> >> I tried adding *quality=90 *argument to these lines of "smarthumb.py": >> * >> * >> img.thumbnail(box, Image.ANTIALIAS) >> >> and >> >> img.save(request.folder + 'uploads/' + thumb) >> >> respectively: >> >> img.save(request.folder + 'uploads/' + thumb, quality=90) >> and >> img.save(request.folder + 'uploads/' + thumb, quality=90) >> >> -- no effect. Any ideas? >> >> >> >> -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
