On 6月17日, 上午7时13分, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> wrote:
> I think there should be a controller even if empty but, if this is for
> testing you can do
>
> def empty(): response.render(request.args(0),{})
That will show "None" in a empty html.
It should be:
def empty(): return response.render(request.args(0),{})
or:
def empty():
response.view = request.args(0)
return dict()
And the referenced xxx.html should under the views route, not in views/
default/xxx.html
>
> and now you can call
>
> http://.../app/default/empty/yourcontroller.html
>
> On Jun 16, 5:22 pm, Tim Michelsen <timmichel...@gmx-topmail.de> wrote:
>
> > > I want to be able to use {{extend}} {{include}} capabilities of the
> > > view, so it is well integrated with the website and I want to be able
> > > to keep it international with T(). I shouldn't need a controller for
> > > that...
>
> > This would be very convenient.
> > For example, sometimes one only wants to test out the same page with
> > different results.
>
> > I tried this in a controller
>
> > In [4]: controller_page1 = "test"
>
> > In [5]: controller_page2 = controller_page1
>
> > In [6]: contr
> > controller_page1 controller_page2
>
> > In [6]: controller_page2
> > Out[6]: 'test'
>
> > but the page call for controller_page2 would lead to an invalid request.
>
> > Kind regards,
> > Timmie
>
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"web2py Web Framework" group.
To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
