Is there a reason its name stupid css as oppose to lets say simple css or silly css? Just curious to see how safe it is to use it.
On Friday, March 4, 2016 at 9:48:29 PM UTC-5, Dave S wrote: > > > > On Friday, March 4, 2016 at 4:56:36 PM UTC-8, Dave S wrote: >> >> >> >> On Friday, March 4, 2016 at 4:01:09 PM UTC-8, Massimo Di Pierro wrote: >>> >>> If you want to try it with web2py here is welcome app based on stupid.css >>> >>> https://github.com/mdipierro/web2py-welcome-theme-stupid >>> >>> Notice a few things: >>> - It does not require any change in the python code or form styles or >>> grid. I >>> - It works with the existing bootstrap classes, it simply ignores. Too >>> much trouble to remove them everywhere. >>> - The static folder is significative lighter. >>> >>> >> I copied the appconfig.ini from the standard welcome app; is the >> [forms]formstyle option ignored? (bullet 2 suggests 'yes') >> >> Also, on the login form, the "Log In" button is appreciably smaller than >> the "Sign Up" and the "Lost Password" buttons; is that because it is an >> input field and the others are button buttons? >> >> The H1 with class="glass" and contents "STUPID.CSS" has a noticeable band >> over the background picture, slightly higher than the letter height, but >> not the height of the enclosing DIV. >> >> For the quarter-div with the ADMIN stuff, it looks like I've got a >> missing glyph -- there's a rectangle about the size of the 'A' in Admin, >> with the 10-over-01 pattern that I think FF uses for missing font >> characters. >> > > Doh! This one is on me. I forgot to tell NoScript to allow that IP > (127.0.0.1, as it happens). Updating that got me the gear symbol. > > >> >> Otherwise, the page looks very good! >> >> >>> Massimo >>> >>> >> Thanks! >> >> /dps >> >> >>> On Friday, 4 March 2016 08:51:00 UTC-6, villas wrote: >>>> >>>> I love this. It would be so cool if this was maintained with the rest >>>> of the framework and widgets could then include the generic stupid.css. >>>> The grid could use it and this would resolve a lot of issues with choice >>>> of css framework. >>>> >>>> A couple of questions spring to mind: >>>> Does anyone need another CSS framework! Will there be enough support >>>> to keep it going? I was reminded of the doubts I had about Markmin, but >>>> this has been great and I use it a lot and it seems to have hardly >>>> required >>>> any support or huge extra effort. I am disappointed that Markmin isn't >>>> more popular, but very glad it exists. I feel that stupid.css could be a >>>> similar kind of thing. >>>> >>>> Is it intended that users use this for standard widgets and then add >>>> Bootstrap or Semantic or whatever for any extras? Its simplicity is not >>>> going to resolve every requirement. >>>> >>>> I'm not convinced about the name, but at least it is memorable! >>>> >>>> -- Resources: - http://web2py.com - http://web2py.com/book (Documentation) - http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code) - https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues) --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
