On Friday, 4 March 2016 18:56:36 UTC-6, Dave S wrote: > > > > On Friday, March 4, 2016 at 4:01:09 PM UTC-8, Massimo Di Pierro wrote: >> >> If you want to try it with web2py here is welcome app based on stupid.css >> >> https://github.com/mdipierro/web2py-welcome-theme-stupid >> >> Notice a few things: >> - It does not require any change in the python code or form styles or >> grid. I >> - It works with the existing bootstrap classes, it simply ignores. Too >> much trouble to remove them everywhere. >> - The static folder is significative lighter. >> >> > I copied the appconfig.ini from the standard welcome app; is the > [forms]formstyle option ignored? (bullet 2 suggests 'yes') >
the bootstrap classes are ignored. The format of the HTML in the bootstrap is instead important. Works with the other style options too but I think works best with the bootstrap html. > Also, on the login form, the "Log In" button is appreciably smaller than > the "Sign Up" and the "Lost Password" buttons; is that because it is an > input field and the others are button buttons? > fixed. > > The H1 with class="glass" and contents "STUPID.CSS" has a noticeable band > over the background picture, slightly higher than the letter height, but > not the height of the enclosing DIV. > That was on purpose. I made it smaller. is it better? > For the quarter-div with the ADMIN stuff, it looks like I've got a missing > glyph -- there's a rectangle about the size of the 'A' in Admin, with the > 10-over-01 pattern that I think FF uses for missing font characters. > Fixed. > > Otherwise, the page looks very good! > Did you try the grid? > Massimo >> >> > Thanks! > > /dps > > >> On Friday, 4 March 2016 08:51:00 UTC-6, villas wrote: >>> >>> I love this. It would be so cool if this was maintained with the rest >>> of the framework and widgets could then include the generic stupid.css. >>> The grid could use it and this would resolve a lot of issues with choice >>> of css framework. >>> >>> A couple of questions spring to mind: >>> Does anyone need another CSS framework! Will there be enough support to >>> keep it going? I was reminded of the doubts I had about Markmin, but this >>> has been great and I use it a lot and it seems to have hardly required any >>> support or huge extra effort. I am disappointed that Markmin isn't more >>> popular, but very glad it exists. I feel that stupid.css could be a >>> similar kind of thing. >>> >>> Is it intended that users use this for standard widgets and then add >>> Bootstrap or Semantic or whatever for any extras? Its simplicity is not >>> going to resolve every requirement. >>> >>> I'm not convinced about the name, but at least it is memorable! >>> >>> -- Resources: - http://web2py.com - http://web2py.com/book (Documentation) - http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code) - https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues) --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
