Fran,

I think to be fair, you could lay those same real world impediments to
Django and Zend as well. Its more of a culture process issue than a
technology selection.

JohnMc

On Jul 7, 4:53 pm, Fran <francisb...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 7, 10:36 pm, eric cs <eeri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I'm just wondering to do big e-commerce sites like
> >www.taget.comorwww.bestbuy.comisn't web2py enough, or does it need more 
> >maturity?
>
> I imagine that a serious site like this would have a team behind it
> which may mean you wouldn't get all the benefits of Web2Py:
> * DB folks may not let you do live migrations
> * Web designers will need the full custom forms so will quickly move
> beyond the rapid prototyping benefits of simple {{=form}}
> * You'll have rigorous change control on upgrades to framework so
> won't benefit from rapid codebase development
>
> Note this isn't a reason against Web2Py for such an application...just
> that it's less of a sweet spot for this framework.
> I see no reason why it would actually be a bad idea to use this
> framework though - I imagine that you'll still be able to prototype
> quickly & deliver a fully-working system just a bit later.
>
> Let us know how you get on :)
>
> F
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"web2py Web Framework" group.
To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to