Massimo, it's a good Idea, and I think starting an IdeaTorrent <http://www.ideatorrent.org/> like Ubuntu <http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/>'s one, would be perfect to define future web2py roadmap based on collaboration. Maybe Reddish can acomplish this...
Alex F El 15/07/2009 6:16, mdipierro escribió: > Good points. > > web2py started with these goals > - be a teaching too (easy to use, easy to read, force users to follow > good practice) > - be secure (you cannot trust students too much ;-) > - be fast > > web2py grow beyond my expectations because many people expressed an > interest, they contributed, and added a lot of features. Moreover in > 2008 the Google App Engine was released and users pushed be and helped > me to port the DAL on GAE. > > For me the real priorities are not limited to but include: > 1) documentation (I write the book but people could help with > docstrings and sphinx since I am no expert) > 2) presentation (layout.html + base.css) for welcome/examples/admin > 3) create plug-in mechanism that allows users to install a new layout > as they download an app > 4) rewrite the DAL (I am doing this). Mostly to make it easier to port > it on more non-SQL databases. It will remain 100% compatible with the > existing one > 5) Integrate more login methods including CAS and OpenID > > I have no plans to move to Python 3.0. It is not a priority and at > this point would be a waste of time. If/when one day we will consider > a successor of web2py we will select the best language for the job and > we will learn from our mistakes (if any). > > This is not a roadmap. Any roadmap needs to be driven by users' needs. > > I think we need to setup a wiki or perhaps a Reddish page where people > can set priorities and vote them up/down. I would be interested in > this. > > Massimo > > > > > > On Jul 14, 10:55 pm, rb<rbspg...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Err.. I'm new to web2py. What is it's history? Where did it begin? >> What was the vision/impetus? >> >> On Jul 14, 4:51 pm, lpg<lucas.gei...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>> I’m interested in using web2py for some business/enterprise >>> applications, but other collaborators of mine have reservations about >>> web2py because it is a new framework, and that there is no explicit >>> long-term roadmap. Some of you may have a similar experience. >>> >>> I think the community would benefit greatly from having a discussion >>> about milestones and the roadmap. My opinion is that web2py will be >>> adopted faster by businesses if the planning was clear and documented. >>> Also we can speed-up releases by concentrating our efforts. >>> >>> Maybe I can begin this discussion by asking: >>> A. What are some of the priorities, either regarding architecture, >>> features, or performance that each of you would like to see in the >>> coming releases of web2py? >>> >>> B. What are the goals for v2.0 and v3.0? >>> >>> Thanks! >>> Lucas >>> > > > > -- Alejandro Fanjul Fdez. alex.fan...@gmail.com www.mhproject.org --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py Web Framework" group. To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
