Thanks Anthony. I'm trying to maintain some reference to the auth mechanism , but our needs get a little more convoluted.
Some Background Info: This is a accounting system (AR/AP/GL/IV/OE/PR/BI/BR/RMA/ ..etc) based upon about 30 years of collected source I have for Chancery / Circuit Clerks for Fees, Fines and restitution and land records et.all. I'm trying to keep it generic as possible for the Supreme Court. >From the Clerks view, the are elected officials for a particular County/Jurisdiction. However, in some instances the may cover several counties / courts (if those are small). Courts are grouped in "districts" and we are going to using "company id" numbers to signify those courts within the districts and all courts under one umbrella for the database. Now the CLERKS have deputy clerks, who may OR may not be assigned to multiple county/courts and may be limited to WHAT or what they cannot do, but are designated by the "company" code to which court they will have access to. Add to that, the wants of our Office of the State Auditors our very own AOC (Administrator of Courts and their auditors) it gets pretty convulsed in a hurry. Now looking at the ACCESS CONTROL stuff, we are really a flipped version of that - GROUP and MEMBERSHIP before and controlling the auth_user.as well as company id in the group and membership/permission file.signifying what court the have jurisdiction to use. (Phew). I hope I haven't totally confused you. Thanks again ... *Ben Duncan* DBA / Chief Software Architect Mississippi State Supreme Court Electronic Filing Division On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 10:03 AM Anthony <abasta...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wednesday, December 12, 2018 at 6:57:07 PM UTC-5, Ben Duncan wrote: >> >> Yes, I wanted to just use the auth_table. >> Everything else is controlled outside of the normal mechs .. >> > > If you don't want to use the Auth login mechanism, then I suppose you can > write your own logic. Keep in mind you will then be responsible for > updating the session with the appropriate auth data so Auth knows the user > is logged in on each subsequent request. But really, I don't see why you > would do that just to avoid having the list of group memberships > automatically updated upon login -- what problem is that creating for you? > > Anthony > > -- > Resources: > - http://web2py.com > - http://web2py.com/book (Documentation) > - http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code) > - https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues) > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "web2py-users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Resources: - http://web2py.com - http://web2py.com/book (Documentation) - http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code) - https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues) --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
