I would also prefer bitbucket (or even github) instead of Google Code. But the own trac (with hg/git/svn whatever) is the best idea i think.
On 14 Paź, 06:09, Thadeus Burgess <thade...@thadeusb.com> wrote: > What about hgwebdir or roll our own app > usinghttp://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/MercurialApiwith our own custom > bug/ticket module? > > Or we could use trac with mercurial integration? > > -Thadeus > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:15 PM, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> wrote: > > > I do not think this is an area where we should eat our own dogfood. > > They probably did it because google code with mercurial was not > > available. The memory limitation is a major issue. > > > On Oct 13, 7:18 pm, Richard <richar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > bitbucket gives max 150MB for free - would that be a problem? > > > Google Code offers 1024MB, which can be increased if necessary: > >http://googlecode.blogspot.com/2008/12/happy-holidays-from-google-cod... > > > > I noticed the other major Python frameworks have rolled their own SVN > > > solutions: > > > -http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk > > > -http://pylonshq.com/svn/Pylons/trunk > > > -http://svn.turbogears.org/projects/tg.devtools/trunk > > > > Not saying we should copy them, but it does look more professional to > > > host it from their own domain. > > > Should we be "eating our own dogfood" here too? > > > > Personally I would prefer Google Code because I am used to it and know > > > it works. > > > > Richard > > > > On Oct 13, 12:13 pm, Yarko Tymciurak <yark...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > can you be more specific? There is no review process in place the > > likes of > > > > code review on google, and that would go a LONG way to our being able > > to > > > > take input from community, even let community review before proj. leads > > > > (e.g. Massimo) approve and merge into mainlines.... > > > > > I don't think bitbucket is nearly as structured (more wiki-fied). > > > > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 7:09 PM, Álvaro Justen [Turicas] < > > > > > alvarojus...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 21:00, Yarko Tymciurak <yark...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > also - bitbucket does not have the review system tied to the > > repository, > > > > > as > > > > > > Guido put in and has been implemented for google code - not to > > mention > > > > > the > > > > > > increased exposure to search for simply being, being reviewed on > > google. > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 6:56 PM, mdipierro < > > mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > >> why one over the other? pros, cons? > > > > > > >> bitbucket had some major downtime last week. > > > > > > I like BitBucket because it is like GitHub that have a great "social" > > > > > integration - I think it is very important for free software > > projects. > > > > > I don't see it so good in Google Code. > > > > > > -- > > > > > Álvaro Justen > > > > > Peta5 - Telecomunicações e Software Livre > > > > > 21 3021-6001 / 9898-0141 > > > > > http://www.peta5.com.br/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
