Let me take a second look... On Feb 17, 5:53 am, John Heenan <johnmhee...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for your comments Thadeus. As mentioned to Massimo, the normal > behaviour of BEAUTIFY is not altered by the sample code. > > John Heenan > > On Feb 17, 1:08 pm, Thadeus Burgess <thade...@thadeusb.com> wrote: > > > I will say this, it is alot better, because you can hardly even tell > > it is a prototyping table, it could in certain situations pass for > > production quality :) > > > -Thadeus > > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 9:06 PM, Thadeus Burgess <thade...@thadeusb.com> > > wrote: > > > I am sorry that I did not comment as well. > > > > I took a look when you originally posted, and I like it. I didn't > > > comment because I do not use BEAUTIFY. > > > > I really do like the recursive, +1 for me, but only as another option > > > to the current beautify not a replacement. > > > > -Thadeus > > > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 7:57 PM, villas <villa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> On Feb 17, 12:07 am, John Heenan <johnmhee...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>> No reaction to including a four line big productivity booster into > > >>> web2py! > > > >> Hi John, > > >> Sorry no one commented! At least I looked at it, and liked it. But > > >> Beautify is only a prototyping & testing thing for most so it's making > > >> something prettier that no one will see. But it's still better, so why > > >> not? +1 > > >> David
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To post to this group, send email to web...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en.
