On Apr 9, 2010, at 8:25 AM, Thadeus Burgess wrote:

> Just as long as its a variable we have to flag on, and web2py
> continues to work like it always has :)

That's the plan.

> 
> -Thadeus
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Jonathan Lundell <jlund...@pobox.com> wrote:
>> On Apr 9, 2010, at 6:16 AM, DenesL wrote:
>> 
>>> I like the semicolon idea.
>>> But doesn't it imply changing web2py, anywhere where args and vars are
>>> used, like the URL function?.
>> 
>> The URL function, yes, because it's basically the rewrite-out handler. 
>> Nobody else should care, because the fields have already been split, unless 
>> an application is using the original URL.
>> 
>> WRT handling missing defaults from a URL (a/c/f), I realized the other day 
>> that it's best to look at it starting with the routes-out side, URL(), and 
>> making the routes-in side complement it. I think that's conceptually simpler 
>> than the implied routes.py approach of managing routes-in and then figuring 
>> out the routes-out complement. Maybe that's just me...
>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Apr 8, 2:22 pm, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> wrote:
>>>> I think if ; is present it be used by default to delimit the args
>>>> since there cannot be confusion there
>>>> 
>>>> /a/c/f.ext;a0/a1/a2
>>>> /a/c/f/a0/a1/a2.ext
>>>> 
>>>> should be parsed in the same way.
>>>> 
>>>> routes_in and routes_out should not be affected since they only
>>>> rewrite the URL before web2py interprets it.
>>>> 
>>>> On Apr 8, 12:43 pm, Thadeus Burgess <thade...@thadeusb.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> I just want it to be able to routes_in on both with ; and without ;.
>>>> 
>>>>> This is because my blog is indexed on google, and I want my old links
>>>>> to still work If I moved over to the ; method.
>>>> 
>>>>> -Thadeus
>>>> 
>>>>> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Jonathan Lundell <jlund...@pobox.com> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> On Apr 8, 2010, at 9:37 AM, Thadeus Burgess wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>>>> How will we be able to configure to use one or the other?
>>>> 
>>>>>> I'm thinking an alternative variable in routes.py.
>>>> 
>>>>>> Also, there would be (I think) a provision for application-specific 
>>>>>> routes.py files, so once the application is resolved at the top level, 
>>>>>> the application-specific parsing could either be in the global routes.py 
>>>>>> (as now) or the app-specific version.
>>>> 
>>>>>>> Will it be able to do "Both" at the same time (for routes_in of
>>>>>>> course). I ask since certain web2py sites are scanned in google, you
>>>>>>> don't want the old links to dis-appear.
>>>> 
>>>>>> Perhaps, but with some restrictions, since using / as the args separator 
>>>>>> leads to ambiguities that don't exist with ;.
>>>> 
>>>>>> I'd like to be able to use standard Python libraries to do the main 
>>>>>> parsing work. Seehttp://docs.python.org/library/urlparse.html
>>>> 
>>>>>> BTW, RFC2396 actually allows a ;-separated parameter on each component 
>>>>>> of the path; you could 
>>>>>> havehttp://domain.com/app;arg1/ctlr;arg2/function;arg3?query_string. I 
>>>>>> don't see a use for that in the web2py architecture, though.
>>>> 
>>>>>>> -Thadeus
>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 11:30 AM, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> 
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> +1
>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Apr 8, 11:25 am, Jonathan Lundell <jlund...@pobox.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> (Context: I've been working on URL parsing.)
>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> One of the difficulties that parsing web2py URLs presents is that the 
>>>>>>>>> boundary between /a/c/f and args isn't explicit, along with the fact 
>>>>>>>>> that pieces of /a/c/f can be implied (in particular when routes.py is 
>>>>>>>>> being used).
>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> RFC2396 (1998) introduced (or rather extended) the notion of 
>>>>>>>>> 'parameters', taking advantage of the fact that ';' is reserved. So 
>>>>>>>>> the RFC2396 approach is to write: /a/c/f;parameters?query_string, or 
>>>>>>>>> in web2py terms /a/c/f;args?vars.
>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> That is, the boundary between /a/c/f and args is marked with a 
>>>>>>>>> semi-colon instead of a slash. Args can of course be further divided 
>>>>>>>>> however one likes; vars is subdivided with '&'.
>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> What I'm working on is an alternative to (or rather extension to) the 
>>>>>>>>> routes.py logic that is capable of supporting arbitrary encoding 
>>>>>>>>> where appropriate (especially in args and vars) and that does not 
>>>>>>>>> rely on regexes to do the work. The present scheme would remain in 
>>>>>>>>> place.
>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Which brings me to my question: I'd like to use the ';' convention to 
>>>>>>>>> separate /a/c/f from args in this new regime. Does anyone have any 
>>>>>>>>> strong feelings about it one way or the other?
>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> (One last thing: the architecture would be somewhat modular, so that 
>>>>>>>>> besides the current mechanism and the one I'm describing, it would be 
>>>>>>>>> fairly straightforward to introduce new ones.)
>>>> 
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>>>> Groups "web2py-users" group.
>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to web...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>>>>> web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group 
>>>>>>>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en.
>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>>> Groups "web2py-users" group.
>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to web...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>>>> web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group 
>>>>>>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en.
>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>> Groups "web2py-users" group.
>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to web...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>>> web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>> For more options, visit this group 
>>>>>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe, reply using "remove me" as the subject.
>> 
>> 
>> 


Reply via email to