I am but it is hard to fit in the DAL paradigm. I can think of NoSQL of something a relational database without JOINS and transactions but ZODB is something more complex. If you have any idea of it could work, let us know.
Massimo On Dec 7, 12:46 am, "G. Clifford Williams" <g...@notadiscussion.com> wrote: > You got it. > > BTW, anyone else interested in ZODB support? It's not the new fangled toy > that these NoSQL databases are but it's still awesome. > > --G. Clifford Williams > Sent from some mobile device > > On Dec 7, 2010, at 12:23 AM, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> wrote: > > > I got CouchDB working. Denes is working on MongoDB. I think we are > > setup for December. In January, you could provide a Cassandra > > server. ;-) > > > massimo > > > On Dec 7, 12:19 am, "G. Clifford Williams" <g...@notadiscussion.com> > > wrote: > >> I can donate a couple of FreeBSD jails with various databases setup if you > >> let me know what you want. > > >> --G. Clifford Williams > >> Sent from some mobile device > > >> On Dec 6, 2010, at 4:38 PM, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> wrote: > > >>> With the new DAL it should take very little to create a DAL interface > >>> to mongodb, couchdb, etc. > > >>> I can work on this if > >>> - you help me prioritize > >>> - you can give me access to a machine that already has your favorite > >>> nosql db installed ready for testing > > >>> Massimo > > >>> On Dec 6, 3:10 pm, Jonathan Lundell <jlund...@pobox.com> wrote: > >>>> On Dec 6, 2010, at 12:55 PM, mdipierro wrote: > > >>>>> 1) The new DAL (dal.py) passes all the tests I have. > >>>>> 2) The new DAL has integrated GAE support (datastore) without need for > >>>>> contrib/gql.py > >>>>> 3) The new DAL is better because more customizable, smaller (10%), and > >>>>> more readable > >>>>> 4) The new DAL is one single file and it does not depend on web2py. > > >>>> Have you decided to keep it as a single file, or break it into a package? > >
