> ----- Original Message ----- > From: mdipierro > Sent: 12/17/10 09:39 PM > To: web2py-users > Subject: [web2py] Re: it case you missed it... > > I think we can all agree on two issues: > 1) the current license (GPL + exception) is OK for almost everybody > 2) the current license is unclear and it is confused with pure GPL. > That is limiting the adoption of web2py. This needs to be addressed, > > How do people feel about the following license: > > GPL3 + Apache > > GPL3 and Apache are compatible (GPL2 and Apache are not). Apache is > very similar to BSD but forces users who distribute modified versions > to spell in detail the changes they make. That should be sufficient to > discourage forks but not to discourage people to use it in commercial > products.
You were one step in front of me. :) +1 -- Branko Vukelic branko.vuke...@gmx.com http://www.brankovukelic.com/ http://flickr.com/photos/foxbunny
