On Dec 22, 9:42 pm, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> wrote: > We can change the name. It is not truly a nigthly built. it is closer > to a release candidate even if the final release is not equivalent to > the latest nightly built.
You should definitely change the name from "nightly" to "release candidate". In many other open-source projects, the quality of nightly builds is so random as be almost completely useless. People often just use nightly's to confirm whether the project compiles, or to see which automated tests failed. Release candidates are the things that get tested, not nightly's.
