We can change the name. It is not truly a nigthly built. it is closer to a release candidate even if the final release is not equivalent to the latest nightly built.
On Dec 22, 1:31 pm, Branko Vukelić <stu...@brankovukelic.com> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 8:29 PM, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> wrote: > > The idea was to have stable and nightly-build. The problem is that > > very few people check the nightly build. > > Well, yeah, it's because it's sounds like a nightly TRUNK dump. :) > It's better to make a 'incubation release' or something like that, so > it's obvious that it's a release. And when it's hatched, you can label > it safe-for-production. I don't know if people would use them, though. > They might still go yuck and decide it's just like nightly, with a > fancy name. :D > > -- > Branko Vukelic > > stu...@brankovukelic.comhttp://www.brankovukelic.com/
