I think it boils dow to who administers them. If there is only one administrator I would use one installation. If they are managed by different people, I would use different installations under different accounts. If they require a background process, I would use different background processes (one per app).
On Mar 13, 7:20 am, Haros <koimiti...@hotmail.com> wrote: > thanks for the reply. > > I know about the domain redirect methods. My question is different > though, which is better, having 1 installation for each domain or 1 > installation for multiple domains? > > On 13 Μαρ, 13:27, Tom Atkins <minkto...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > I'm currently using one web2py instance and and then running multiple sites > > using code in routes.py. This example from Jonathan should be helpful: > > >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/web2py/iq_YAstVUCI/pr65jJRY6JwJ > > > This works fine but is not the most efficient way for high volume sites. > > > Various people have asked for Apache Virtual Host configuration details to > > get this working in the most efficient way but as far as I'm aware no one > > has come up with a step-by-step how-to yet. > > > On 12 March 2011 21:37, Haros <koimiti...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I have in my apache some virtual hosts. I'd like to know which method > > > is better... each virtualhost having its own web2py installation > > > (meaning that each virtual host will use its own wsgi) or one web2py > > > installation and multiple virtual hosts using that installation? (wsgi > > > will be shared, however each virtual host will be accessing it with a > > > different daemon process name as a different user). > > > > Thanks
