Nop! Still there...

Maybe I have wrong build :
Version 1.96.3 (2011-06-06 13:58:28)

Richard

On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Massimo Di Pierro <
massimo.dipie...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I think I fixed this in trunk. Can you please check it?
>
> On Jun 6, 1:03 pm, Richard Vézina <ml.richard.vez...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I just try my app with the 1.96.3 and I got a strange error :
> >
> > Traceback (most recent call last):
> >   File "/version_196-3/web2py/gluon/restricted.py", line 184, in
> restricted
> >     exec ccode in environment
> >   File "/version_196-3/web2py/applications/sgddms/controllers/test.py",
> line
> > 1334, in <module>
> >   File "/version_196-3/web2py/gluon/globals.py", line 137, in <lambda>
> >     self._caller = lambda f: f()
> >   File "/version_196-3/web2py/gluon/tools.py", line 2452, in f
> >     return action(*a, **b)
> >   File "/version_196-3/web2py/applications/sgddms/controllers/test.py",
> line
> > 654, in verify
> >     if form.accepts(request.vars, session):
> >   File "/version_196-3/web2py/gluon/sqlhtml.py", line 1203, in accepts
> >     self.table._db(self.table.id == self.record.id).update(**fields)
> >   File "/version_196-3/web2py/gluon/dal.py", line 5369, in update
> >     fields = self.db[tablename]._listify(update_fields,update=True)
> >   File "/version_196-3/web2py/gluon/dal.py", line 4656, in _listify
> >     raise SyntaxError, 'Field %s does not belong to the table' % name
> > SyntaxError: Field id does not belong to the table
> >
> >   def _listify(self,fields,update=False):
> >         new_fields = []
> >         new_fields_names = []
> >         for name in fields:
> >             if not name in self.fields:
> >                 raise SyntaxError, 'Field %s does not belong to the
> > table' % name
> >
> >             new_fields.append((self[name],fields[name]))
> >             new_fields_names.append(name)
> >         for ofield in self:
> >             if not ofield.name in new_fields_names:
> >
> > *I use a old app and a feature for Postgres that Massimo added in the
> > pass that never been documented and i don't think it was official :*
> >
> > *
> > *
> >
> > *MODEL :*
> >
> > *Field('table_id','id'), # My legacy database used the same name as PK
> > and FK so I had to define them in the model like this*
> >
> > *sequence_name='test_activity_activity_id_seq' # Postgres has it on
> > automation rule to create the sequence name base on the PK name and
> > because I where using legacy database PK name I had also to define the
> > sequence name in my model...*
> >
> > *
> > *
> >
> > *Not sure if there is a link.*
> >
> > *
> > *
> >
> > *Thanks*
> >
> > *
> > *
> >
> > *Richard*
> >
> > *
> > *
> >
> > *
> > *

Reply via email to