Can you try again?
On Jun 6, 2:29 pm, Richard Vézina <ml.richard.vez...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Nop! Still there...
>
> Maybe I have wrong build :
> Version 1.96.3 (2011-06-06 13:58:28)
>
> Richard
>
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Massimo Di Pierro <
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> massimo.dipie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I think I fixed this in trunk. Can you please check it?
>
> > On Jun 6, 1:03 pm, Richard Vézina <ml.richard.vez...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Hello,
>
> > > I just try my app with the 1.96.3 and I got a strange error :
>
> > > Traceback (most recent call last):
> > > File "/version_196-3/web2py/gluon/restricted.py", line 184, in
> > restricted
> > > exec ccode in environment
> > > File "/version_196-3/web2py/applications/sgddms/controllers/test.py",
> > line
> > > 1334, in <module>
> > > File "/version_196-3/web2py/gluon/globals.py", line 137, in <lambda>
> > > self._caller = lambda f: f()
> > > File "/version_196-3/web2py/gluon/tools.py", line 2452, in f
> > > return action(*a, **b)
> > > File "/version_196-3/web2py/applications/sgddms/controllers/test.py",
> > line
> > > 654, in verify
> > > if form.accepts(request.vars, session):
> > > File "/version_196-3/web2py/gluon/sqlhtml.py", line 1203, in accepts
> > > self.table._db(self.table.id == self.record.id).update(**fields)
> > > File "/version_196-3/web2py/gluon/dal.py", line 5369, in update
> > > fields = self.db[tablename]._listify(update_fields,update=True)
> > > File "/version_196-3/web2py/gluon/dal.py", line 4656, in _listify
> > > raise SyntaxError, 'Field %s does not belong to the table' % name
> > > SyntaxError: Field id does not belong to the table
>
> > > def _listify(self,fields,update=False):
> > > new_fields = []
> > > new_fields_names = []
> > > for name in fields:
> > > if not name in self.fields:
> > > raise SyntaxError, 'Field %s does not belong to the
> > > table' % name
>
> > > new_fields.append((self[name],fields[name]))
> > > new_fields_names.append(name)
> > > for ofield in self:
> > > if not ofield.name in new_fields_names:
>
> > > *I use a old app and a feature for Postgres that Massimo added in the
> > > pass that never been documented and i don't think it was official :*
>
> > > *
> > > *
>
> > > *MODEL :*
>
> > > *Field('table_id','id'), # My legacy database used the same name as PK
> > > and FK so I had to define them in the model like this*
>
> > > *sequence_name='test_activity_activity_id_seq' # Postgres has it on
> > > automation rule to create the sequence name base on the PK name and
> > > because I where using legacy database PK name I had also to define the
> > > sequence name in my model...*
>
> > > *
> > > *
>
> > > *Not sure if there is a link.*
>
> > > *
> > > *
>
> > > *Thanks*
>
> > > *
> > > *
>
> > > *Richard*
>
> > > *
> > > *
>
> > > *
> > > *
