Massimo, Thanks for the quick response.
This is actually a good thing as it will force me to get my Postgresql chops together now rather than later. Cliff Kachinske On Aug 30, 8:20 am, Massimo Di Pierro <massimo.dipie...@gmail.com> wrote: > Currently, even appadmin is tenant dependent. > > On Aug 30, 6:03 am, Cliff <cjk...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Is request_tenant supposed to work this way? > > > In my model I have a tenants table, which I define before I add the > > request_tenant field. In that table I have one tenant. > > > In my auth_user table I have one user. His request_tenant field is > > set to the id of the one tenant in the tenant table. > > > Okay so far. > > > I log in as that one user and open the appadmin database page. The > > appadmin will show me records that belong to the tenant. If I create > > a record with a bogus request_tenant id, I can't see it in the > > appadmin database index pages. > > > If I log out and use appadmin I can see all the rows on the index > > pages BUT the signature fields and the request_tenant field are > > invisible. > > > Are request_tenant and appadmin supposed to interact this way? It > > seems like appadmin should be able to see all records in a table, > > regardless of the request_tenant setting. > > > Thanks, > > Cliff Kachinske
