It allows me to see all the rows in the table, irrespective of request_tenant, but it does not show me the signature columns or the request_tenant column. It acts this way whether I am logged in as a user or not.
Using 1.98.2, by the way. This is not a high priority, though. I asked the original question to find out if I have a bug in my code. Since it appears not, I'm content to work around the problem. On Aug 30, 12:07 pm, Massimo Di Pierro <massimo.dipie...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think you can disable this although I have not tried. In your model: > > if request.controller=='appadmin': db._request_tenant=None > > If this does what you want, please let me know. > > On Aug 30, 7:20 am, Massimo Di Pierro <massimo.dipie...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Currently, even appadmin is tenant dependent. > > > On Aug 30, 6:03 am, Cliff <cjk...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Is request_tenant supposed to work this way? > > > > In my model I have a tenants table, which I define before I add the > > > request_tenant field. In that table I have one tenant. > > > > In my auth_user table I have one user. His request_tenant field is > > > set to the id of the one tenant in the tenant table. > > > > Okay so far. > > > > I log in as that one user and open the appadmin database page. The > > > appadmin will show me records that belong to the tenant. If I create > > > a record with a bogus request_tenant id, I can't see it in the > > > appadmin database index pages. > > > > If I log out and use appadmin I can see all the rows on the index > > > pages BUT the signature fields and the request_tenant field are > > > invisible. > > > > Are request_tenant and appadmin supposed to interact this way? It > > > seems like appadmin should be able to see all records in a table, > > > regardless of the request_tenant setting. > > > > Thanks, > > > Cliff Kachinske
