Can you try again?
On Aug 31, 7:10 pm, Anthony <abasta...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Windows 7 with Python 2.7, I get an immediate traceback, and then the > thum's start -- but it just keeps going without getting to a "reporting > task". Here's the entire output (I broke this one after 11 thum's, but ran > another one for over 30 thum's): > > thumnew task > > starting task > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "meta_scheduler.py", line 140, in <module> > MetaScheduler().loop() > File "meta_scheduler.py", line 133, in loop > self.report_task(task,self.async(task)) > File "meta_scheduler.py", line 56, in async > p.start() > File "C:\Python27\lib\multiprocessing\process.py", line 104, in start > self._popen = Popen(self) > File "C:\Python27\lib\multiprocessing\forking.py", line 244, in __init__ > dump(process_obj, to_child, HIGHEST_PROTOCOL) > File "C:\Python27\lib\multiprocessing\forking.py", line 167, in dump > ForkingPickler(file, protocol).dump(obj) > File "C:\Python27\lib\pickle.py", line 224, in dump > self.save(obj) > File "C:\Python27\lib\pickle.py", line 331, in save > self.save_reduce(obj=obj, *rv) > File "C:\Python27\lib\pickle.py", line 419, in save_reduce > save(state) > File "C:\Python27\lib\pickle.py", line 286, in save > f(self, obj) # Call unbound method with explicit self > File "C:\Python27\lib\pickle.py", line 649, in save_dict > self._batch_setitems(obj.iteritems()) > File "C:\Python27\lib\pickle.py", line 681, in _batch_setitems > save(v) > File "C:\Python27\lib\pickle.py", line 286, in save > f(self, obj) # Call unbound method with explicit self > File "C:\Python27\lib\multiprocessing\forking.py", line 40, in dispatcher > self.save_reduce(obj=obj, *rv) > File "C:\Python27\lib\pickle.py", line 401, in save_reduce > save(args) > File "C:\Python27\lib\pickle.py", line 286, in save > f(self, obj) # Call unbound method with explicit self > File "C:\Python27\lib\pickle.py", line 548, in save_tuple > save(element) > File "C:\Python27\lib\pickle.py", line 331, in save > self.save_reduce(obj=obj, *rv) > File "C:\Python27\lib\pickle.py", line 419, in save_reduce > save(state) > File "C:\Python27\lib\pickle.py", line 286, in save > f(self, obj) # Call unbound method with explicit self > File "C:\Python27\lib\pickle.py", line 649, in save_dict > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "<string>", line 1, in <module> > self._batch_setitems(obj.iteritems()) > File "C:\Python27\lib\multiprocessing\forking.py", line 347, in main > File "C:\Python27\lib\pickle.py", line 681, in _batch_setitems > self = load(from_parent) > save(v) > File "C:\Python27\lib\pickle.py", line 1378, in load > File "C:\Python27\lib\pickle.py", line 331, in save > return Unpickler(file).load() > self.save_reduce(obj=obj, *rv) > File "C:\Python27\lib\pickle.py", line 858, in load > File "C:\Python27\lib\pickle.py", line 419, in save_reduce > save(state) > File "C:\Python27\lib\pickle.py", line 286, in save > dispatch[key](self) > File "C:\Python27\lib\pickle.py", line 880, in load_eof > f(self, obj) # Call unbound method with explicit self > File "C:\Python27\lib\pickle.py", line 649, in save_dict > raise EOFError > EOFError > self._batch_setitems(obj.iteritems()) > File "C:\Python27\lib\pickle.py", line 681, in _batch_setitems > save(v) > File "C:\Python27\lib\pickle.py", line 331, in save > self.save_reduce(obj=obj, *rv) > File "C:\Python27\lib\pickle.py", line 396, in save_reduce > save(cls) > File "C:\Python27\lib\pickle.py", line 286, in save > f(self, obj) # Call unbound method with explicit self > File "C:\Python27\lib\pickle.py", line 748, in save_global > (obj, module, name)) > pickle.PicklingError: Can't pickle <type 'thread.lock'>: it's not found as > thread.lock > thum > thum > thum > thum > thum > thum > thum > thum > thum > thum > thum > ^C > > Anthony > > > > > > > > On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 7:39:51 PM UTC-4, Massimo Di Pierro wrote: > > > Trying to isolate the problem... can any windows user run the > > following test for me? > > > get trunk > > cd web2py/gluon > > python2.6 meta_scheduler.py > > > (python 2.7 should be ok too) > > you should get the following text repeated ... > > --- begin ---- > > starting task > > task started > > thum > > thum > > thum > > thum > > thum > > reporting task > > --- end --- > > after a few cycles press [ctrl+c]. Do you get a traceback? Do all new > > task - reporting task pair up in the output? > > > Massimo > > > On Aug 31, 8:45 am, António Ramos <ramst...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > the -K option is only for 2.6 but with python 2.6 i have that screenshot > > > > with error until i break it with ctrl c > > > after that the task runs only the first time and not the other 2 as your > > > demo on Vimeo > > > > Thanks > > > > 2011/8/31 Massimo Di Pierro <massimo....@gmail.com> > > > > > Did the previous version work? > > > > > On Aug 31, 4:11 am, António Ramos <ramst...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > i reported the same problem. > > > > > Web2py works very well so far except this sheduler. > > > > > I have windows 7 machine and python 2.6 and 2.7 > > > > > > 2011/8/31 Massimo Di Pierro <massimo....@gmail.com> > > > > > > > Do you have these errors only with the scheduler? > > > > > > Does everything else in web2py works well? > > > > > > > I am rewriting the scheduler completely but there seems problems > > with > > > > > > the multiprocessing module. > > > > > > I think the problem is due to this: > > >http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3405397/python-multiprocessing-doe. > > > > .. > > > > > > > Massimo > > > > > > > On Aug 30, 11:25 pm, Brian M <bmer...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Similar results with a fresh install of Python 2.7.2 I don't > > think > > > > this > > > > > > is > > > > > > > just due to a bad python install.
