we do. We have the nightly build and we do post release candidates in advance. The problem is that not many people test it.
On Monday, 5 March 2012 12:31:49 UTC-6, spiffytech wrote: > > Have you considered publishing release candidates ~1 week ahead of a > release, to allow early-adopters to upgrade and see what's broken, > rather than having the rapid stream of releases? I saw you said "I'm > releasing 1.99.5 tomorrow, please test it today", but that's rather a > short and informal testing cycle. > > > On Mar 4, 5:29 pm, Massimo Di Pierro <massimo.dipie...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Same as 1.99.5 and 1.99.6 but should solve all the outstanding > > compatibility issues. > > > > Massimo
