Thanks! I will try it out :)
On Wednesday, July 25, 2012 3:55:39 AM UTC+2, Anthony wrote: > > On Tuesday, July 24, 2012 5:58:29 PM UTC-4, Derek wrote: >> >> Make it a computed field? >> > > I'm not sure that would be helpful in this case. A computed field computes > its value automatically based on other fields in the record, but in this > case, he needs to pickle an object, which is not one of the other fields. > Also, it needs to be unpickled when queried, which a computed field > wouldn't handle. > > Anthony > --
