yes but by converting the object to string we can see what it is in the 
generated url. I cannot reproduce the problem.

On Wednesday, 1 August 2012 10:54:10 UTC-5, Jonathan Lundell wrote:
>
> On 1 Aug 2012, at 8:42 AM, Massimo Di Pierro <massimo.dipie...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
>
> in trunk. please check it.
>
>
> Per my earlier message, this should not be necessary. There must be 
> something else wrong, and str() unfortunately just papers over whatever the 
> real problem is.
>
>
> On Wednesday, 1 August 2012 10:23:11 UTC-5, AbrahamLinksys wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have an appilcation that has been running for a while, and suddenly 
>> today it gave an error on this line in my view:
>>
>>  
>>   [<a href="{{=URL(r=request,args=request.args,vars=dict(all=1)) }}">show 
>> all attachements</a>]
>>
>> This worked fine, but then I think I upgraded from 1.99.4 to 1.99.7, and 
>> it throws an error complaining that it cannot concatenate string and int 
>> types (because of dict(all=1) instead of all='1')
>>
>> Of course, the error can be fixed by passing a string literal or calling 
>> str() on the int, but i was curious if this intended? 
>>
>> I haven't been very careful to only use string vars, assuming that my 
>> laziness would be corrected by some gluonic magic. 
>>
>> Am I supposed to have always been passing only strings as vars? Should I 
>> be proactive and hunt down places in my code in other applications (which 
>> are still using slightly older web2py versions) or is this something that 
>> might change back to being able to use integers? 
>>
>> Just curious. Here's the relevant part of the traceback:
>>
>>   File "/usr/web2py-latest/gluon/html.py", line 330, in URL
>>     other += '?%s' % '&'.join([var[0]+'='+var[1] for var in list_vars])
>> TypeError: cannot concatenate 'str' and 'int' objects
>>
>>
>> If the "other+=" line were rewritten as such, would it be a bad thing for 
>> any reason?
>>
>>     other += '?%s' % '&'.join([*str(*var[0]*)*+'='+str(var[1]) for var in 
>> list_vars])
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Abe
>>
>>
> -- 
>  
>
>
>
>

-- 



Reply via email to